🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has upheld a ban on sending national guard in the Oregon city, after a recent legal decision.

Judicial Panel Agrees to Rehear Case

The ninth circuit court of appeals decided on this week that it would reexamine the legal dispute concerning the executive power with an expanded panel of eleven justices. The court also vacated a earlier ruling from a smaller judicial group that had sided with the federal government.

Ongoing Dispute Over Military Presence

This order represents the latest development in a protracted legal battle over whether the administration has the legal right and valid reason to send national guard forces in Portland. Approximately 200 federalized guard members have been in limbo since the end of September when the deployment effort was started in response to ongoing demonstrations.

Differing Viewpoints

The administration has claimed that federal officials at the ICE facility in south Portland were facing threats, while local authorities assert that municipal police have command of the situation.

Contrary to characterizations of Portland as “war ravaged”, residents have been sharing videos of scenic paths and a thriving food scene, and organizing events such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the “militarization of our city”.

Recent Legal Actions

The Tuesday ruling came after a federal judge in the city enacted two temporary restraining orders this period – one blocking the federalization of the Oregon national guard, and another stopping the deployment of any national guard troops in the state, after attempts to circumvent the first order by mobilizing troops from California.

On Monday, the ninth circuit panel had put the first ruling on hold – permitting control of 200 Oregon national guard – but the subsequent injunction stayed effective, preventing the actual deployment of the troops.

Full Panel Consideration

The Tuesday decision means the matter will be heard by the full court – with both rulings under review simultaneously – by a group of 11 judges.

“This ruling demonstrates that facts are important and that the courts are working to ensure government responsibility. The constitution limits the president’s power, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a training ground for expansive government power,” said the legal representative in a statement.

“The judicial body is sending a definite signal: the president cannot send the armed forces into American urban areas without cause. We will continue defending state legislation, principles, and sovereignty as this case moves forward and our fight continues in the courts.”